Tuesday, September 20, 2016

Hadleyville Cemetery Part 2


·         Introduction
o   Provide background to the problem at hand. What are some of the problems and challenges facing Hadleyville Cemetery?
§   The town of Pleasant Valley would like a detailed, accurate map of the Hadleyville Cemetery; however, all maps and original records have been lost. The cemetery also has monuments dating as far back as 1865, many of which are likely made of limestone or marble. These materials tend to degrade over time and many of the engravings will be difficult or impossible to read. Burial plots with no remaining monument marking them will also add to the challenge of creating a complete collection of attributes for each plot.
o   Why is building a GIS of this project better than a simple map and/or spreadsheet?
§  A GIS will attach the collected attribute data to a specific geographical location within the cemetery; this method will make utilization of the data much more user friendly and preserve the data more extensively. Factors such as weather and vandalism could result in loss or relocation of a monument. A GIS will have the data attached to the location of the plot, making it much easier to replace the monument and to verify occupancy of a particular plot for future additions. In the past cemeteries have used identification numbers for plots and visitors were given the ID number corresponding to their loved one, as well as a general area within the cemetery the plot could be located. This method can make locating a plot somewhat difficult and time consuming, particularly for nonexistent or illegible monuments and/or those who have never visited the cemetery.  If made accessible to the public, a GIS would also make it easier for visitors to locate their loved ones. Users could access a high resolution image of the cemetery and locate the plot with data for their loved one, the predominance of smart phones also adds to the convenience of this method.
o   What equipment are you going to use to gather the data needed to construct the GIS; i.e. what is the overall approach?
§  In order to obtain base map imagery a UAS was programmed to execute a series of flights around the cemetery. The attribute data will be collected using a field notebook and photography; in a field notebook a basic layout map will be drawn with each plot numbered and attribute data corresponding to each plot recorded. As the attribute data is collected each monument will also be photographed using a cell phone or digital camera. In order to obtain very precise locations of each plot, their locations will be recorded using a survey grade GPS.
o   What are the overall objectives of the method being employed to gather the data?
§  A detailed image of the cemetery to use for the base map would make it much easier for one to orient themselves and successfully locate a specific plot while in the cemetery itself or from another location, using a UAS with high resolution photography capabilities will make this possible. The basic layout with a numbering system used to designate attribute data to a plot along with photographs will help ensure accuracy of the attribute data collected. The photographs could also be potentially used as a pop-up image when the corresponding plot is clicked on by a user viewing the map, if a web map is created.  
·         Methods
o   What combination of geospatial tools did the class use in order to conduct the survey? Why?
§  A UAS from the Phantom series was used for the aerial imagery. According to www.dji.com , the entire Phantom series contains a gimbal with 3-axis stabilization capabilities and are all created for high-level aerial photography. The class used notebooks to record data and cellular phones to photograph the same data that was recorded manually, this will help to ensure accuracy. The photographs will be useful in assessing any un-noted or un-clear data. The use of a survey grade GPS receiver was attempted, however a complete list of points would have been extremely time consuming and a signal was not found when under trees. This GPS receiver was selected over a mapping grade receiver because the mapping grade GPS is generally accurate to within a meter, many plots are closer together than this.
o   What is the accuracy of each piece of equipment you are intending to use?
§  According to an article posted by Mike Tully at http://www.mapps.org/blogpost/726441/237476/Just-How-Accurate-is-Your-Drone , a combination of factors contribute to the overall positional accuracy of the orthophoto produced. Some of these include; the camera`s potential, the stability of the flight, the quality of the GPS data, and the number and quality of ground control points. Based on these factors alone, the Phantom appears capable of producing accurate imagery for the project: The UAS Phantom series boasts high quality and well stabilized cameras, the flights were made on a day with little wind and appeared to be stable, the cemetery itself is large enough that GPS data should be sufficient for locating it, the six ground control points used in the 1.5-acre cemetery were sufficient and well-marked with bright colors. Had the survey grade GPS been successfully used, they are accurate up to a centimeter. This accuracy would avoid overlap in points that could have occurred with a mapping grade GPS.
o   How was the data recorded? List the different methods and state why a pure digital approach is not always best. What media types are being used for data collection? Formats?
§  The aerial imagery was recorded digitally using a camera, this was necessary for a detailed base map. The attribute data was recorded manually in a notebook, but also documented using the camera of a cell phone. Data empirically collected in-situ tends to be the most accurate and a hardcopy of attributes helps to ensure the data is not lost.
o   How will you transfer the data you gather into a GIS?
§  Once the base map has been created and properly projected, location points will be added for each plot on the map. An excel table of all attribute data as well as coordinate information designated by the points will then be created, the table will be converted into a csv files, and then imported into a GIS by linking it to the coordinate points.
o    What equipment failures occurred, if any? What was done to remedy the situation?
§  There was only one survey grade GPS unit available for use and data collection was taking a very long time. The unit also did not maintain service when under trees. Due to these difficulties the collected coordinates were discarded and the use of the equipment eliminated from the project. The clarity of the aerial imagery combined with the detailed data collected will make completion of this project possible without GPS coordinates for each plot.
o   What might have been done to facilitate data collection in terms of equipment and refining the method?
§  The collection of GPS data could have been successful if at least two were available and they had stronger receivers. There were also some large gaps in between graves as well as some monuments piled along the edges of the cemetery, indicating the presence of unmarked plots. GPR equipment could have most likely shed some light on the locations of unmarked, occupied plots.
·         Conclusion
o   How did the methods transfer to the overall objectives of the project?
§    The use of a UAS to take aerial imagery will produce a detailed and accurate base map. The collection of as many observable attributes as possible as well as digital photographs of each site where data was observed will enhance the detail of the finished product.
o   How did the mixed formats of data collection relate to the accuracy and expediency of the survey?
§  Each method of data collection contributed to successfully collecting all data necessary to meet the goal of this project, to create a detailed and accurate map of the Hadleyville Cemetery. If only the UAS was used, it would have taken a very long time for someone to manually drive it to each plot site and take an up close photograph, on the other hand no selfie stick would have been long enough to obtain the quality of aerial imagery we were able to obtain using the UAS for the base map. Photographs taken during empirical data collection created a backup for any questionable data collected.
o   Describe the overall success of the survey, and speculate on the outcome of the data.

§  Before setting out to gather data, the class as a whole did not communicate methods of collection or assign groups to areas. However, after separating and realizing this small groups did communicate and then other small groups communicated further with other groups. This survey method may result in some overlap in data collection and perhaps a few gaps, but it is likely that very close to all plots were observed and accounted for. If there is any overlap, that data would either match or be looked at more closely, both resulting in better accuracy.  

Monday, September 12, 2016

Hadleyville Cemetery Part 1


·      Introduction
o   Provide background to the problem at hand. What are the problems and challenges facing Hadleyville cemetery?
§  The town of Pleasant Valle would like a detailed, accurate map of the Hadleyville Cemetery; however, all maps and original records have been lost. The cemetery also has monuments dating as far back as 1865, many of which are likely made of limestone or marble. These materials tend to degrade over time and many of the engravings will be difficult or impossible to read. Burial plots without any identification will also add to the challenge of creating a complete collection of attributes for each plot.
o   Why is the loss of original maps and records a particular challenge for this project?
§  In creating an updated and accurate map for the cemetery the original records and maps would be very useful in identifying unmarked burial plots, which would not only assist in the development of complete records but also help to eliminate the sale of an already occupied plot. A monument that has been left un-replaced most likely indicates the lack of any loved ones left in the area, making identification very difficult.
o   How will GIS provide a solution to this problem?
§  GIS is capable of storing the necessary information associated with the spatial data included within the map, which will fulfill the request of a detailed map. ArcGIS online can then be used to publish the results as a web map with all the associated records for each plot accessible by simply clicking on a plot. The web map can also be shared in various manners, which should greatly reduce the odds of the information being lost again.
o   What makes this a GIS project, and not a simple map?
§  The Town of Pleasant Valley has requested a detailed map. They would not only like an accurate map of burial plot locations but also attribute information for each plot and a GIS is needed to store the attributes associated with each plot.
o   What equipment are you going to use to gather the data needed to construct the GIS?
§  A UAV will be used to obtain a current, high resolution aerial image of the cemetery, a survey grade GPS will be used to collect coordinates of each plot, and a field notebook will be used to record a predetermined list of observable attribute information about each point recorded. The predetermined list will include; name, sex, birth date, date of passing, head stone condition, and headstone material. GPR equipment would be useful in determining whether or not any unmarked areas are occupied and in surveying the outskirts of the cemetery to define boundaries and ensure no occupied areas are missed. Paint would be used to outline unmarked plots and flags will be used to label the GPS assigned point number for each unmarked plot.
o   What drawbacks are there to the method you propose? How do the pros outweigh the cons of this method?
§  The biggest drawback would be lack of information. Given that all original records have been lost, it will be very difficult to obtain attribute information about the burial plots without monuments or illegible monuments. The age of some of the plots could also be a drawback; according to Geomodel, Inc., GPR equipment has more difficulty detecting burials that are older than 50 years. The presence of rocks and tree roots can also impede upon the ability of GPR equipment to detect burial remains. A possible remedy to these issues is that it may be possible in situations where a casket no longer remains for GPR data to be analyzed for trenches or disturbed soil as an indication of burial. Another drawback could be obtaining accurate attribute data for each plot; this however can be remedied with specific, simplified language for information to be collected and sufficient communication concerning method of collection. Despite the lack of original data, the UAV will be able to provide a very accurate image of the current state of the cemetery, the survey grade GPS will be able to generate very accurate coordinates for each plot, careful field observation can help to obtain a complete as possible attribute table, and finally GPR equipment could prove to be of great value in the prevention of the sale of an already occupied plot as well as delimiting the current boundaries of the cemetery.
·      Methods
o   What is the sampling technique you chose to use? Why?
§  Each headstone will be marked by a point on a survey grade GPS unit. The attributes associated with each occupied plot will be recorded in a field notebook. From here the data collected will be transferred into a table, and then linked to the GPS points. A UAV equipped with a high resolution camera will take a photo of the entire cemetery; this photo will be used as a base map for the GPS points and the connected attributes. From here, the hope is to make an interactive map by linking the GPS points and associated attributes to the high resolution base map, so it is usable by the county officials or anyone who does not have any form of training in GIS. The idea is to make the final product as user friendly as is possible by creating an interactive web map for the county to use.
o   What is the accuracy of the equipment you are intending to use? (Be sure to cover each piece of equipment)
§  The GPS unit will be a survey grade unit, which is accurate up to a centimeter, to prevent graves from being inaccurately marked. The UAV will have a very high resolution camera and the ability to collect data from various altitudes in order to obtain an optimal image. The accuracy of humans collecting data will depend on pre-organization and planning as well as the individual`s ability to collect data. The GPR equipment should be able to obtain information from depths of at least 8 feet below ground and accuracy will be affected by soil type and age of the burial.
o   How was the data entered/recorded? Why did choose this data entry method?
§  In the field, the data will be recorded as points on a GPS unit with the associated attributes being written in a field notebook. Once the necessary data has been collected, the GPS points will be uploaded into a GIS, and the attributes entered into a table. This method has been chosen because it is the most direct method of data collection.
o   How will you transfer the data you gather into a GIS?
§  Each attribute will be entered into an excel table, converted into a csv file, and imported into a GIS by linking it to the GPS points.
o   What drawbacks are there to the method you propose? How do the pros outweigh the cons of this method?
§  There are several opportunities for human error while collecting the data, but this method is a simple and efficient way of providing the county with the needed data. The chance of human error can also be significantly reduced by the formation of a well thought out, detailed method for attribute data collection and double checking every entry. Because the scale of the project is fairly small, any errors in data should be easily corrected.
·      Conclusion
o   How do your methods transfer to the overall objectives of your proposal?
§  The intent is to create an interactive web map that can be used by anyone regardless of the amount of GIS training. The methods outlined here will provide just that. By linking the GPS points to the attributes and then using an accurate base map to show the current condition of the cemetery, any person with an internet connection, and some computer literacy, should be able to click any point on the map to find out if the plot is occupied, and in many cases by whom. This would also help to prevent any future loss of records.